Book Title: Mahavidya Vidambanam
Author(s): Vadindra Bhatt, Anandpurna, Bhuvansundarsuri, Mangesh R Telang
Publisher: Central Library

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 32
________________ Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra www.kobatirth.org Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir xxvii particular period to Áuandapûrņa. He seems to have Aourished after Śaukara Miśra (A.D. 1529), author of the Sankarî commentary on Khandana. We meet with the following passage in the refutation of a definition of Pratyaksha (direct perception) in Sriharsha's Khandana:__अथ यदनन्तरं न विजातीयप्रमित्सा तद्भावस्तथात्वम् । तन्न । तत्साजात्यानवगतौ तद्विजातीयत्वानवगतेः, अरिसंपदि अनुमानादिविषयायां प्रत्यक्षयितुमनिष्टेश्च । खण्डन पृ. ३१८ (Lazarus Edition) Ditto पृ. ५८६ ( चौखम्बा) Saukar Miśra in commenting upon this passage says that the reading अनुमानादिविषयायां is gramatically inaccurate and accepts अनुमानादिविषये as the correct reading. But Anandpûrņa in his Vidyasagari recites the implied objection of Sankara Miśra against the reading Thaifungi and answers the objection by stating reasons in support of the said reading. Tron this circumstance it is clear that Anandpůrna who has criticized Sankara Misra's view must have lived after him i.e.after A.D. 1529. We have already stated above that Madhusûdana who lived in the 17th century has referred to Anandapûrna under the name of Vidyasagara. We must therefore place Anandapurna between A. D. 1529 and 1600. The Commentator Bhuvanasundara-We now turn to Bhuvanasundarasûri, author of the second commentary published with the text of Mahavidya vidambana in the present volume. From the verses at the commencement and at the end of his commentary we gather the following information about Bhuvanasundara :-He was a pupil of Sri Somasundara sûri belonging to Tapa-gachha sect. He wrote the commentary at the command of his preceptor.He studied logic under Gunaratna+ (author of Shad-darśana-samuchaya-Vritti A. D. 1409). The commentary of Mahavidya-vidambana which he calls Vyákhyánadîpika was composed by him in the temple of Śrî Párávanátha at Harshapura. Charitrarája and Ratnashekhar Muni, two Jain scholars revised Bhuvanasundara's commentary and 1 अनुमानादिविषयायामिति प्रमादपाठः । अनुमानादिविषये इति पाठः साधीयान् । खण्डन, शाङ्करीटीका पृ. ३१९ 2 विषयायामिति लिङ्गप्रयोगोऽनुपपन्नो, नियतपुल्लिङ्गत्वाद्विषयशब्दस्येतिचेत् । न। विषयशब्दस्य भावपरत्वात् , विषयतायामिति विवक्षितत्वात् , 'येकयोर्दिवचनेकवचने' इति प्रयोगात् यथा द्वित्वैकत्वयोरिति विवक्षितमिति। खण्डन, विद्यासागरीटीका पृ. ५८७ (चौखम्बा) 3 श्रीमत्तपाङ्गणनोऽङ्गणभानुकल्पश्रीसोमसुन्दरगुरोः प्रवरोपदेशम् । आसाद्य साहस मदं क्रियते मयैतद्ग्रन्थातिदुर्गमपदार्थविवेचनायाम् ॥ महाविद्यावि० टीका पृ. १ 4 तर्कादिग्रन्थविषये यत्किञ्चिज्ज्ञायते मया । तत्र श्रीगुणरत्नाव्हगुरूणां वाग्विजृम्भितम् ॥ महाविद्यावि० टीका पृ. १ 5 हर्षपुरनामनगरे देवश्रीपार्श्वनाथशुभदृष्टौ । व्याख्यानदीपिकेयं समर्थिता भवतु जयलक्ष्म्यै ॥ महाविद्यावि० टीका पृ. १५० For Private And Personal Use Only

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247