Book Title: Vijay Vvallabhsuri Smarak Granth
Author(s): Mahavir Jain Vidyalaya Mumbai
Publisher: Mahavir Jain Vidyalay

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 572
________________ BRUHN: KHAJURAHO individuality (see below). Figures provided with a question mark ma y have individuality, but no identification was possible. The Roman numbers refer to certain types of sculptures (type with Siva-iconography, type characterized by lotus and citron, and so on). As some of the types are of a very doubtful character and as the assignment to a type is often questionable, we might have marked many figures with a '?' or 'O' as well as with a number. On the other hand in many cases 'I' and 'II' means almost the same as 'Siva' and 'Vişnu', and only because of the gradual transition to less and less distinct Sivas and Vişņus which makes a decision often difficult the names are always avoided. Some figures, however, are explained by a name, not because of especially correct iconography but because transitional figures are not represented so that it was not necessary to introduce a special 'type'. In the 'Statistics' the members of the types are listed. In the case of types I and II those figures are mentioned first which bear the greatest resemblance with these gods, and the figures with few 'iconograms' peculiar to them are enumerated later. By 'iconogram' in opposition to a mere attribute) I mean any feature (mudrä, asana, attribute etc.) which identifies a being either as an individual strictly speaking (e.g. Rşabha generally to be recognized by the hair-locks) or as a member of an individual group (e.g. tirthamkaras largely to be recognized by their nudity). As some iconograms found with the sculptures of our temple (lotus, 'padmasarpa', snake, citron) have spread from certain figures to others they cannot, in a n y context, be taken as significant. They appear along with statues to whom they originally do not belong (Siva and Vişnu with citron) or are found isolated (couple with 'padmasarpa' as sole attribute), and they lose, accordingly, their significance even in the proper context (lotus along with cakra gives no sufficient evidence that the figure is actually meant to be Vişnu). Especially figures with such iconograms are defined by '?', 'O' or are enumerated at the end of the lists for type I and II. For terms not explained here refer to Notes. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756