Book Title: Kalpasutra
Author(s): Hermann Jacobi
Publisher: Leipzig

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 35
________________ Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra www.kobatirth.org Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir 22 Kalpasútra. After having given such information about the general questions connected with Jainism and its literature, as I was izble to gather, I shall now discuss the Kalpasútra in particular. That work does not belong to the Âgamas or sacred books of the Jainas. It is even pronounced by the Digambaras te be a forgery (see Indian Antiquary) because it contains the account of Mahâvîra's having entered the womb of Devânandâ before he was placed in that of Tricalâ, which the Digambaras deny to have been the case. But as the same story is also related in the Acârâïgn and Âvacyaka Sätras, it seems to be very old, and consequently the criticism of the Digambaras falls to the ground. With the vetâmbaras the Kalpasútra is a great authority, and is alw:lys read publicly during the varshâvâsa or l'ajjusan. The Kalpasůtra is supposed to be the work of Bhadrabâhu. He is said to have found the materials for it in the ninth pûrva, called Pratyakhyânapravâda, as we learn from the following passage of its commentary called Kiraņâvali. pranetâ tâvat sarvâksharasamnipâtavicakshanac caturdaçapûrvavid yugapradhânaḥ çrîBhadrabâhusvâmî dacâçrutaskandhasyâ 'shtamadhyayanarûpatayâ pratyakhyânaprava dâbhidhananavamapûrvật Kalpasûtram idam sâtritavân. "But the author was the yugapradhana Bhadrabâhusvâmin, who was well versed in the combination of all letters (see note to § 138), and knew the fourteen pûrvas. He composed this Kalpasûtra as the eighth chapter of the Daçâçrutaskandha, by extracting it from the ninth pûrva called Pratyâkhyânaprava da". The statement of the Kiranâvali, which is repeated by other commentators, that the Kalpasútra is called Paryushanåkalpa, and forms the eighth chapter of the Daçâçrutaskandha, is erroneous and has been caused by a wrong interpretation of the last words of the Kalpasûtra itself. Rightly understood, they prove that it applies only to the last part, the Sâmâcârîs, or rules for yatis. For at the end of the Kalpasûtra it is said that Mahavîra "thus pronounced, thus enunciated, thus declared, thus explained the (eighth) chapter called Paryushanakalpa". These words can only have reference to the Samâ cârîs, because the Jinacaritra and the Sthavirâvalî cannot be expected to have been related by Mahậvira. For the former mentions events which happened after his death, and the second part exclusively refers to the history of Jainism after Mahâvîra. Besides, those parts have no relation to the Paryushanâ or varshâvâsa. They have, therefore, no claim to the title Paryushanakalpa, and cannot, consequently, be regarded as having, originally, made part of the eighth chapter of the Daçâcrutaskandha. The naiural consequence of the preceding deduction is, the Sâmâcârîs only, being comprised by the name Paryushana kalpa, and forming the eighth chapter of the Daçãçiutaskandha, can be looked upon as the work of Bhadrabâhu. It is self-evident For Private and Personal Use Only

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191