Book Title: Vaishali Abhinandan Granth
Author(s): Yogendra Mishra
Publisher: Research Institute of Prakrit Jainology and Ahimsa

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 266
________________ The Constitutional History of Vaisali 225 The change referred to by Megasthenes seems to have been a historical event. How it used to happen can also be inferred. In the Vedic age the states were small ones and had different types of constitution. In one type we are told that the administration was carried on in an Assembly of rajans (kings)"; the Satapatha Brahmana tells us that in such assemblies, he used to become a king whose kingship was assented to by others.2 The Assembly of kings' was the assembly of aristocratic leaders, and among them he became king or the head of the state, who was elevated to that position by the consent of the other members. When the headship of a person thus elected tended to become hereditary, kingship was the result; when this development was not permitted, the republic was the consequence. Changes from one form of the government to the other must have been not infrequent. According to the Pauranic traditions, the monarchical form of government continued to prevail at Vaisali for about 13 generations after the time of king Visala. Puranas continue the dynastic lists of other houses down to the beginning of the Bbarata war, but have nothing to say about the successors of Pramati, who was the last king of Vaisali, and who flourished about 30 generations before the Bharata war. This silence must be due to the establishment of a republican form of government at the city. The date of the Bharata war seems to be c. 1400 B. C.; the establishment of the Vaisali republic took place about 30 generations or 600 years before this event. We may approximately date this constitutional change in c. 2000 B. C. A word of explanation is necessary about the term republic. The word now denotes a state where sovereignty is vested in the entire body cf its citizens on the widest possible basis. It is however to be noted that such was not the case in the past. The term republic was used by the ancients to denote a state where the sovereign power was vested not in one single individual but in a group or college of persons, more or less numerous. Thus Sparta, Athens, Carthage, Rome, Venice, the United Netherlands and Poland have been described even by modern writers on constitutional history as republics, though sovereignty in these states was vested 1. Tet: a TFT: afwafaa (R. V., X. 9-7.) 2. यस्मै वै राजानो राज्यमनुमन्यन्ते स राजा भवति न स यस्मै न / Satapatha Brahmana (IX, 3-2-5)

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592