________________
36
to be equally absord and fallacious to offer as a Thesis a statement which everyone would accept as a plain statement of fact. No less absurd than to propose the Theais "Sound is inaudible" is to propose the Thesis “ Sound is audible." In proof & Universally accepted truth is treated as an imperfect Thesis.” (Hindu Logic els preserved in China and Japan p. 62.) As noted by Principal Vidhusékhara, Ch reads Retrôzzafez and T RERIET for a ll of the Skt, text. T' first names it startenaren but afterwards in illustrating it below reads प्रसिद्धसंबन्ध.
T* reads zaliha, periferia, Fies and Perles for the last four, which makes only a difference of language, साध्यधर्म and साध्यधर्मिन् being equivalents of विशेषण and विशेष्य respectively, and you in the last corresponding to pa of the Skt, text. It is interesting to note that Bhāmaha, the great Buddhist poetician, while giving a summary of Logic ( ta 5 :'), in the course of his treatment of lee adopts the same classification as that given here ( alama [= 3-60
मन्तहीनं दुष्ट', and illustrates the last दुष्टप्रतिक्षा = (पक्षाभास) which he calls statuut by the example given in our Skt. text. " s a HU 1991 saat Bhāmaha's Kavyālamkāra V. 19.). Thus, the correctness of the reading in the Sanskrit text- art-is warranted by the N.Pr. Vịtti, Ch, T', half of T' and Bhāmaha's Kávyalamkāra. Kumarila in his slokaVartika mentions 'सर्वलोकप्रसिद्धिविरोध' which should not be mistaken as supporting the reading sferiana of T. For, in SI, Vārt it appears as a variety of Tafane, which in its turn is one of the fatics of the six pramāņas. This he illustrates as follows: "agrecimeni
AT Aina 1 a uhren F12 asta n” In the scheme of the N. Pr. this would fall under ' ' and has there. fore nothing to do with the effects of T' given in the place of mind. PärthasārathiMis'ra, the
