Kalplata Vivek

SR No.: 032756
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 550
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 15 MB

Page 97

88 not carried to its extreme.1 (p. 81, 1. 23). In the former ill. "Pandu ksamani vadanam" etc. the necessary ancillaries of Pathos which are irrelevant to Love-in-separation should be avoided. For instance, mention of death is irrelevant there, unless the re-union is ere long to occur. (p. 81, 1. 17) Sometimes mentiou of death does not interfere with delineation of the Erotic sentiment when the poet has genius enough to depict it rightly, e.g. tirthe toya-vyatikara-bhave jahnu-kanya-saravyor deha-lyagad amara-ganana. lekhyam asadya sadyah/ purva."kara-dhikatara-ruca sagatah kantaya.'sau lilagaresv aramata punai nandanabhyantaresu //? Here the death of Aja is mentioned, yet his union with his beloved is described immediately hence the mention of death becomes an ancillary of the sentiment of Love-in-separation. (p. 81, 1. 25) In the following verse ancillaries of Erotic sentiment serve as a foil to enhance the beauty of Santa, the relevant rasa in the verse: satyam manorama ramah satyam ramya vibhutayah / kintu mattangana panga-bhanga-lolam hi jivitam //3 The remarks (P. 81, 1. 11) are borrowed from Locana (P. 368). The original (P. 81, 1. 13) Horrows from ध्वन्यालोक : तदङ्गानामेवादोषो नातदङ्गानाम् / (P. 366); Viveka borrows from Locana. At P. 81, 1. 14, ध्वन्यालोक is drawn upon : आश्रयविच्छेदे रसस्यात्यन्तfaasaga: 1 qr|175746 (P. 366); Viveka borrows from Locana. At P. 81, 1. 16. xq. and 2197 are drawn upon. Both these read 916418cat (op. cit. P, 366). At P. 81, 1. 17 69=1471712 is drawn upon : 7517 aT #Tural S10 FanffqTH 461faggfaarat arrafareti (P. 366). At P. 81, 1. 22. Locana is drawn upon : 377 Eutiera: sarfa: qux falfaa: 1 t. (P. 348), 2. This is Raghu. VIII. 95. It is quoted in 0 (P. 366). cf,' sta ga gafaar FTO TYHI Fat l' Locana (P. 366). These words are obviously borrowed by the original (vide Viveka-P. 81, 1. 21), According to ao and t here the ancillary of Srngara is introduced either to attract the attention of those who are to be instructed (vineyan) or to lend exquisite charm to the poem; hence there is no dosa, Mammata does not accept these explanations (vide K. P.-P 375). According to him the tremulousness of the side glances is the welknown उपमान here and as such, it nourishes Santa cf 'प्रसिद्धभंगुरोपमानतया उपात्तं rada gooifat i' (also cf H.K.S.-P. 162.1, 11-12. Jand Petraziniet: attratfuata!' K. P,-(P. 375)