Page Text
________________ The ill. is (p. 69 1. 9.): dipra-dipa nisa jajne vya pavitta.divakara / 1 Here'night is the substratum which is the object of inference (sadhya-dharmini) and disappearance of the sun' is the property to be proved (Sadhya-dharma). Here 'long disappearance of the sun' can be logically proved only by the Reason dipra.dipatvam (possessing brilliantly shining lamps). ? (p. 70, 1. 4) Fallacies of Reason (hetvabhasa) in Poetry: 3 According to Bhamaha there are three fallacies of Reason in poetry viz. Ajnana, Samsaya and Viparyayakrt 4 The ills. of these fallacious Reasons are not traceable 5 (ix) Dtstanta in poetry (p. 70, 1. 8): Example (in poetry) is the demonstration of the reflection of the sense already expressed. * This definition is not traceable in Viveka. But an objection is taken to this definition of Example, as follows: (p. 70, 1. 8)' Example (Drstanta) is not different from Simile (Upama). In Upama there is a relation of the object and the image (bimba-pratibimbabhava). In 'candra iva mukham', an ill. of Upama, mukha (face) is the object (bimba) and candra (moon) is the image (pratibimba). In Dystanta e. g. 'tanur-iayn kva vilocana-harini similar relation subsists. Why should it not then be included in Upama? Bhama has reply to this objections is (p. 70, 1. 11): 'na hetv anabhidhanatah/'8 It cannot be so included under Upama as the definition of Upama viz. "The charming similitude between the thing 1. B. K. L. V. 51 ab. 2 ta: ragadt9qh9gat tafiti [ibid] V. 51 cd. 3. तस्यापि सुधियामिष्टा दोषाः प्रांगुदितास्त्रयः / Badalafaqinat (741) 11 [ibid] V. 52. 4. The compound 37514Tutaqua: is dissolved thus : 331a: 7 ARTT: विपर्ययकृत् च अज्ञानसंशयविपर्ययकृतः / Viveka notes that it is wrong to dissolve it as To a tara a fa9999 ara gafa sfa ' 3731 being negative in nature cannot have a productive cause (cf. 5. I. p. 123). 5. [vide] B, K, L. V. 53 and 54. 6. Jeffen Terra: ufafazafaasiah ! (ibid] V. 55 ab. 7. 77941ahareg (ibid] V. 55c. This is a better reading. Prof Tatacharya reads ELUHITATTET [vide J. I. p. 124 ff.). 8. calamaa: is explained thus in Viveka (P. 70 1 25) : ap TagAtAZTfa84a मानोपमेयभावत्वस्योपमालक्षणस्य अविद्यमानत्वाद् उपमाहेतोः उपमालक्षणस्य अनभिधानम् इति दृष्टान्तस्य उपमातः पृथग्भावेन अभिधानम् /
| SR No. | 032756 |
| Book Title | Kalplata Vivek |
| Original Sutra Author | N/A |
| Author | Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry |
| Publisher | L D Indology Ahmedabad |
| Publication Year | 1968 |
| Total Pages | 550 |
| Language | Hindi, Sanskrit |
| Classification | Book_Devnagari |
| File Size | 15 MB |