Kalplata Vivek

SR No.: 032756
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 550
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 15 MB

Page 79

70 when it is deficient in all the three aspects another hetvabhasa arises. Thus there are seven hetvabhasas, which are all illustrated and explained in Viveka.1 (ix) (p 61, 1. 18) Now in order to introduce the dosa of defective Example (Drstanta.dusta),? Example (distanta) is defined:3 What is logically proved e.ther to possess or not to possess the object of Inference (sadhya-dharma) and the Reason (sadhana-dharma), is called Example (Drstanta). If it is otherwise, it is called a defective (dusta) 'Example. It is defective when either the olject to be prored is not present in it, i. It is : arthatase only. In all there are seven (3+?+!). The ills. are as follows: (p. 60, 1. 3ff.) (1) Tag (p. 60, 1 5) : tacy: 7: gaiart Here the hetu, being a product', is not present in the similar case (akasa) and also in the dissimilar case (ghata). (2) 3Tfhgratartotta fram (p. 60, 1. 10) : facat: 75EUR: garaia! Here the hetu, having limitedly extended body,' is absent from the paksa (<7<<T), present in vipaksa (घटादि) and according to Kanada in sapaksa (परमाण्वादि). (3) 3TACTATUITOT (p. 60, 1. 16): fart: 270EUR: 374EAIT Here the hetu, not being cognisable ', is absent from the paksa (1767) and the sa-paksa (9707091f) as also from the vipaksa (azifa). (4) Sturtuaalf-a(p. 60, 1. 22) : 3fach: 7: 3deart 1 Here, the hetu not having limitedly extended body,' is present in paksa (2766) as well as in sa-paksa (gfx) but it is also present in the vi-paksa (371913T). (5) Tatuaaaa (. 60, 1, 27) : 371924: 3767: 2019TT I Here, the hetu being apprehended by the sense of audition, is present in the paksa (17), absent from the vi-paksa (371972T) but also from the sapaksa (97) (for quica belongs to sound alone, acc, to Bauddhas, though acc, to Kanada it belongs to ar (genus) also.] (6) at (p. 61, 1, 5) : Face: 2767: 97807917 | Here the hetu being perceived by vision,' is present in sa paksa (95) and is absent from vipaksa (Taroaifa), but also from the paksa (767). (7) (p. 61, 1. 13) 3faca: tac: Batcart 1 Here the hetu 'not being a product,' is present neither in the paksa (TT) nor in the sa-paksa (azife), and is present in the vi-paksa (31771-T). Hence it is deficient in all the three aspects whereas the first three of the above are deficient in two aspects & the next three in one. 2. Bhamaha has treated of this dosa : afasiegezFaPS174 &c 1 B. K. L. V. 1. 3. zatezara7aafzai fare terra gaya i afavazat asfal (ibid) V. 26 abc. 4. THEFTha: 1 V. 26 d.