Kalplata Vivek

SR No.: 032756
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 550
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 15 MB

Page 71

The second ill. is (p. 33, 1. 8.): sruti.samadhikam ucсaih puncamam pidayuntah sctatam rsabha-hiram bhinnakikrtya sad jam/ frinijagadur akaku-s:avaka-snigdha-kantha) parinatim iti ratrer magadha Madhavaya //1 In Magadhi giti, pancama is to be avoided in bhinnasd ja. For binna.sadja is without pancama ard rsabha." (b) Nstta-kala-virodhi (p. 33, 1. 22): What viclates the rules of dancing laid down by sage Bhajata is against the art of dancing. If, for instance, (p. 33, I. 29)' scme cther gods than Visnu, Uma and Mahesvara are respectively worshipped in Ranga-dvara (Puspanjali), Cari (Lasya) and Maha. cari (Tandava) it would be Nitta-kala-viruddha. 4 (c) Natya-kala-viruddha (p. 40, 1. 21): What violates the rules of dramaturgy is Natya kala. virodhi. The ill. is (p. 40, 1. 22): 'sthaying 'the pravartante bhavah sancarino jatha / rasaspaikasja bhuyamsas tatha netur mahabhglah// Here the words 'sthayinah rasasya' are against the theory of Rasa according to all the three schools. (v) Nyaya-virodhi (p. 41. 1. 25): Nyaya meang Sastra, which deals with 1. fallXI, . 2. धांशस्तु धैवतन्यासः पञ्चमर्षभवर्जितः / qeliznaataa 779551 52a: 11 quoted in K. S. of Hema candra (P. 269) This verse is quoted by Hemacandra as the ill. of the same dosa. The comments on it in H, K, S, are borrowed by Kalpalata. The whole passage on P. 33. 1. 73 10 1. 21 is borrowed from H, K, S. V. (P. 269) The verses are all borrowed from N. S. (XXVIII. 42-45), The verse STARTET etc, is quoted also by Trap on S. K. I. v. 74. but he reads siTFT &c probably the reading there of the whole verse is corrupt (vide S. K. R.-P. 49). 3. रङ्गद्वारे प्रयुक्ते तु विष्णुः प्रीतो भवेदिह / तथा चार्या प्रयुक्तायामुमा तुष्टा भवेदिह / महाचार्या प्रयुक्तायां तुष्टो भूतपतिर्भवेत् // Then follows a long discussion, as to whether the desa under consideration is a Natya dosa or a Nitta dosa, the conclusion is that it is either the latter or both. 5. falso II. 87. 6. Viveka points out that in whatever way you interpret the word F91f779:- whether you take it as Nom, or Acc. plu, or as Abl. or Gen. sing.---the verse is against Rasa theory.