Kalplata Vivek

SR No.: 032756
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 550
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 15 MB

Page 61

rtham/' When words, whose import is already conveyed by some othet words, are employed in a statement, this dosa arises, (P. 26, 1. 14) Vamana gives certain exceptional cases when under certain conditions uktartha does not involve any dosa. When, for instance, a substantive, whose sense is already conveyed by some other word in a sentence, is used to help apprehend the sense of its adjective, there is no dosa. The ill. is : jagada madhuram vacam visadaksara-salinim/ 3 Here the sense of the substantive 'vacam' is conveyed by the verb 'jagada', it would thus be a repetition. But the word vacam, according to Vamana, is used here to help apprehend the sense of the adjective visadaksara-salinim' hence the use is faultless. Mammata does not accept this view. He says that it is not proper to indulge in such new usages, though we may somehow account for the existing ones. The sense of the adjective can even be brought out by an adverb and thus the tautology can be avoided. According to Mammata, jagada madhuram etc. is quite unsupportable. He, therefore, suggests another illustration if at all the sutra is to be justified. The ill. is ( 26, 1. 15 ) caranatra-paritrana etc. (quoted in extenso in fn. 4 to P. 47). Ekartha (P. 26, 1. 18): According to Bhamaha this is of two types: Sabda-punarukta and Artha-punarukta. The former variety is too gross to be 1. That is, according to the vstti on Vamans sutra (67, facea " K. L, S, II. ii. 12. For a contrary opinion cp. Bhojas Sengara Prakasa - Vol. I-part II (p. 241) - by Dr. V. Raghavan, where << 7. faga " is interpreted as giving another variety of Vamanas Ekartha. The vrtti on the sutra does not seem to support this view. Even then Rudratas Asambaddha is Ekartha of Vamana, 2. fariquet , V. K. L. S. II. ii. 18. 3. (Ibid) p. 27. 4. ffageachta | K. P. VII58. (p. 349) cf. Vamana's are a II. ii. 19. 5. Kalpalata here borrows wholesale from K. P. VII: न खलु कर्णावतसादिवज्जघनकाञ्चीत्यादि क्रियते / ' जगाद मधुरां वाचं विशदाक्षरशालिनीम् / ' इत्यादौ क्रियाविशेषणत्वेऽपि विवक्षितार्थप्रतीतिसिद्धौ “गतार्थस्यापि विशेष्यस्य विशेषणदानार्थ क्वचित् प्रयोगः कार्यः-इति न युक्तमुक्तम् / युक्तत्वे वा चरणत्रपरित्राणरहिताभ्यामपि द्रुतम् / Enzi qaqa no 7 fega il referer 11 p. 349. 6. According to Viveka this can be avoided if we say : (p. 26 1. 14) "मधुरं विशदाक्षरशालि च जगाद"