Kalplata Vivek

SR No.: 032756
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 550
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 15 MB

Page 55

46 komalapalalau tanvi pallavas cadharas ca te // is (P. 24, I. 1). The exception to Hino pama dosa is discussed by Bhoja : yatropamana-dharmah syur nopameyena sammitah ] taddhino pamam ity ahus tat prasiddhau na dusyati // When the epithets of the upameya are more in number than those of the upamana, the Upama is defective and is called Hino pama, but this ceases to be a blemish when the upamana is welknown." (P. 24, 1. 2) In the same may, Adhikopama is some time not a dosa. When the epithets of the upamana are more in number than those of the upameya the Adhikopamadosa arises. But sometimes it is not a dosa. kramenanena kytibhir estavyam adhikopamam/ visesas tapameyangam anumanat pratiyate // The ill. is not traceable in Viveka, (24) Arilimad (P. 24, 1. 6) : When due to the absence of some guna a poem offends against the riti (style) it is called Aritimads. It is of three types : Sabda-pradhana, Artha-pradhana and Ubhayapradhana. In the former two, sound and sense are respectively predominant while in the last both are important. Those Aritimad poems which are contrary to the guna, Slesa, Samata or Saukumarya are Sabdapradhana, those which offend against the guna, Kanti, Prasada or Artha-vyakli are Artha-pradhana and those that offend against the guna Ojas, Madhurya or Audarya are Ubhaya-pradhana. Thus Aritimad is of nine types. Sithila (looseness ), Visama (unevenness ), Kathora (harshness ), Aprasanna (Abstruse ), Neyartha (Ellipsis) Gramya (Unrefined ), Asamasla (Compoundless ), Aniruyatha (Unfinishod ) and Analamkara ( dull or unembellished ). 1. 'Viveka (P. 23, 1. 23). 2. The ill, of this is not traceable in Viveka. Bhoja gives it at S. K. I, v. 165 (P. - 118). It is borrowed from B K. L. II. 41. Is it possible that Bhamaha here criticises those who think this verse to be Hinopama ? For he thinks that complete similarity is not possible. Even the ill. at B. K. L. I. 58 (Upamanadhikya according to K. P.-vide P. 592) is not accepted by Bhamaha, and there too he refers to B. K. L. I. 43 and B. K. L. I. 60. The Viveka does not discuss the ills. here probably because they are dealt with in Ch. IV under Upama-dosas. S. K. I. 122. 4. Bboja S. K. I. v. 165 (P. 119) borrows it from B, K, L, I. 58. 5. This dosa is given by Boja (vide S. K. I. 28, 29). The styles, as Viveka (P. 24, 1. 6) points out are वैदर्भी, गौडी and पाञ्चाली. 6. All these dosas viz Sithila etc. are discussed by Dandi in his Kavyadarsa not as dosas but as the reversals of the ten gunas which according to him are vitally essential to the Vaidarbha style (vide K, D. I. 40-92.)