Kalplata Vivek

SR No.: 032756
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Murari Lal Nagar, Harishankar Shastry
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 550
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 15 MB

Page 141

132 (p. 252, 1. 10) Another variety of Utpreksa not given by Rudrata but pointed out by Namisadhu' is discussed. The ills. cannot be traced. Utpre. ksavayava is included under Utpreksa. (5) Sasandeha (p. 253, 1. 8): The definition of Sasandeha is explained The ill. is : yo go pi-jana-vallabhah etc. (p. 253, 1. 26 ) Other illustrations of Sasandeha are discussed.* (6) Rupaka (p. 254, 1. 8): The distinction between Upama and Rupaka is pointed out. (p. 254, 1, 14 ) Udbhata's illustration of Eka.desa-vivarti Rupaka is discussed. (p. 254, 1. 20) The varieties of Rubaka viz Vakya-Rupaka and SamasaRupaka and their varieties and sub-varieties as given by Rudrata are discussed and some of the illustrations given by Rudrata and Nami. are reviewed, (p. 255, 1, 12) Bhoja's divisions of Rupaka are discussed. (7) Apahnuti (p. 256, 1. 10): Probably the original quotes Bhamahas definition of Apahnuti. The first illustration is not traceable. The second is borrowed from Bhoja along with his remarks thereon, 10 1. Vide Namis comments on R. K. L. VIII. 37. नयोगः सत्यौपम्येऽनिवादिरपि यत्र / संभाव्यते ही 2. Discussion of graaya is borrowed from Bhoja who along with Vamana accepts this as a distinict figure (vide S. K.-P. 468). 3. This ill, of te is quoted by Nami, on R, K, L. VIII. 64. They are fria. IX. 15. (quoted by afd. on R; K. L. VIII, 66) and VIIT. 53. others think them to contain उत्प्रेक्षा and not ससन्देह. 5. The ill, is : FYra faror 997 etc. fyX, 34, also quoted by Hemacandra, who is drawn upon by Viveka here. vide V. K, L, S. (P. 13). The original probably borrows from Induraja, who explains the meaning of g t in his Vitti (P. 19). 7. For instance, Taay aganyat etc, which is Namis ill of a sub-variety of agatata रूपक, is संदेहसंकर according to Viveka. 8, P. 255, 1, 17 (cf. S. K. IV. v. 34); P. 255, 1. 18 (cf, S, K, IV. v. 35); P. 255, 1, 20 (cf. S. K. IV. v. 33); P. 255, 1, 21 (cf. S. K. IV. v. 41); P. 255, 1, 25 (cf. S. K, IV. V. 42); P, 256, 1.6 (cf. S. K. IV. v. 46); P. 256, 1. 4 (cf, S. K. IV. v. 47). In the discussion of these illustrations the original often draws upon Bhojas Vrtti on them. 9. Vide B, K. L. III. 21. 10. S. K. IV v. 82 (The comments are borrowed from Bhoja : 215 7521ETTSETTET (19152ENET T rafagat: gaafalgary etc. I P. 450). This is Dantii illustration of det vide K. D. 11 266.