Aptavani Shreni 08

SR No.: 030038
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Dada Bhagwan
Publisher: Dada Bhagwan Aradhana Trust
Total Pages: 436
Language: English
Classification: Book_English
File Size: 1 MB

Page 192

Aptavani-8
139
(vyavaharik satya), in the Lord's language, is untruth (asatya). When you say, 'I am Chandubhai, I am his uncle', and all that, it is untruth in the language of the Lord. It is dependent and with expectation (sapeksha); it is not independent or void of expectation (nirpeksha).
It is wrong to get caught up in partiality (pakshapati - on one side; to side with), partiality means standard. And to stay in a standard, would be considered adherence to one's own truth (ekantik). Nevertheless, people should stick to their own rules. However, in the Ultimate state (aatyantik), there are no rules; it is all-encompassing and accepting of all points of view (anekant). There is no insistence or stubbornness (aagraha) in it whatsoever. It carries on with exactness. With it, you can reach ultimate salvation. Otherwise, all these sects and denominations, are just standards. When one becomes impartial and does not side with any viewpoint (nishpakshapati), then it becomes worth it. When you become impartial, then you are out of standard.
I am only here to tell you everything that is correct. And if you say to me, 'No, I am right.' then I would not sit around with you any longer, I do not have that sort of time. Then I would not get into an argument with you. I would tell you, 'By your viewpoint, you are correct', saying that, I ('we') would let it go. If you want to understand truth, I am here to help you understand; or else time would be wasted, and it would be a waste of time and energy! Many have misunderstood the Gnan because of their own perceptions. How can I go around modifying everyone? If you need help, then you should ask me.
That is why you need to understand dualism (dwaita) and non-dualism (adwaita). In this time-cycle (kaad), how can you say non-dualism? Non-dualism did not exist even before! Besides, even I cannot say non-dualism.
There is no sense in accepting anything without first putting