________________
574
A CRITICAL STUDY OF PAUMACARIYAN
अण-जम्मण १४२, वहण ११४४. कोवण ११४४
प्रणय-मन्तणय ५६६, मज्जरणय ७८।२४, सोसरणय २८1५०, लज्जणय १०४।६ Tautology are also foundसुसुयत्थगन्धगन्धं १।२३, जम्बुदीवदीवे २।१, तमन्धार ४६।५२, रुद्धपहमग्गं ३३।२
Syntax The following peculiar uses of some Case-forms are found in the PCV :(A) Genitive for Accusativeतुम पि वि मे न संभरसि ६४।१०० । Genetive for Ablative
नयरस्स तुरियचलो विणिग्गयो ४।३६, असमत्थो इमस्स दुक्खस्स मोइउ अम्हे ११८।२७; See १७।३३।२११७४; २२।१०२; ३१।१२७; ५६०४१; ८१।६;
५३७५; १०६।४३; १०६।१; ११२।१२. (B) Locative for Accusative
लीलाए वच्चमाणा चउसु वि मासेसु.................. पत्ता अवन्ति विसय ३३।११;
आगया मए दळु २०।१२७; See ६६।२२; १०२।१६; ५६।१६; ११११४. Locative for Instrumental is commonसा वि य बाणेसु पडिरूद्धा ५१।१४; (२।१०६, २८।६४, ७१।४३, १०१।३८).
The above types of uses are sanctioned by Hemacandra (8.3. 134, 135).
Locative for Dative-दाऊण रायलच्छी सुएसु ५।१६ Locative for Ablative-फलाइं गिण्हन्ति पायवगणेसु ३।१४२ (५।१६३, १०२।४६,११३।३०) Locative for Genitive-लक्खणरामेसु का गणना ६८।४८ Inst. for Genitive-का गणणा पाय चारेणं २८१६७
The above types of instances are also observed in the PCV. 'Me' as I Sing. Acc. is observed in the VH also (VH, Tr. p. 25). Instances of Loc. for Inst. and Loc. for Abl. are observed in the Dhūrtakhyāna also (Ibid, Int. p. 53). . . These are the instances of Inst. used for Locative
बज्जन्ति जिणहरेहिं तुराई ६६।२४, सेज्जाहि सुहनिसण्णा १४।१४२, पणिवइया 7 राहवस्स चलणेहिं १०१।२८.
Such instances are found in the Dhūrtakhyana also (Ibid p. 53). Pischel (371) notes that in the Amg., Instrumental stands for Locative too.
