SearchBrowseAboutContactDonate
Page Preview
Page 88
Loading...
Download File
Download File
Page Text
________________ 72 APPENDIX B. The plaintiff's contention is that Bhagabai had only a Hindu widow's estate and therefore the will is null and void. As to the law, he contended that, Jainas being Hindu dissenters, the parties are governed by Hindu Law and Bhagabai had only a Hindu widovr's estate. As to the defendants' evidence, he took objection, which can be classified as follows :-(1) that custom of one Jaina sect may not prevail in another sect; (2) the quantity and quality of evidence addnced are not enough to prove custom, because. (i) Only six instances are given ; (ü) The oldest of them is 10 years old; (ii) in the instances given the reversioners did not dispute the gifts made by the widows; (iv) The Jaina Lav Books cited do not give an absolute · Estate to the widow ; (3) The Jaina Law Books are no authority, because they have never been cited in courts in British India ; and (4) That in any case, a Jaina widow has no absolute powers over ancestral property. He referred me to the following authorities :I. L. R. 3 Allahabad 55 16 " 4 30 197 " . 4 Calcutta : port of his first group of objections. Mayne's Hindu Law, page 58 (7th Edition), 14 Moore's Indian Appeal page 585, in support of bis 2nd group of objections. I. L. R. 1 Allahabad 688 in support of his 4th objection. All these anthorities are considered below :1. The defendants naturally disputed all these arguments for tho plaintiff. They contended that the Jainas were governed 379 744, in sap
SR No.011057
Book TitleJaina Law Bhadrabahu Samhita
Original Sutra AuthorN/A
AuthorJ L Jaini
PublisherZZZ Unknown
Publication Year
Total Pages146
LanguageEnglish
ClassificationBook_English
File Size5 MB
Copyright © Jain Education International. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy